From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8866 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2003 23:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8847 invoked by uid 48); 2 Feb 2003 23:04:45 -0000 Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 23:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030202230445.8846.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/8421: scm5d6 segfaults when eval.c is compiled with -O2 optimisation X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: scm5d6 segfaults when eval.c is compiled with -O2 optimisation State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 2 23:04:45 2003 State-Changed-Why: I think the "testcase" - a whole package - is a little too large to find out what actually is going wrong. Could you please try to isolate where exactly something is miscompiled, and possibly come up with a small testcase that shows this problem? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8421