From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14891 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2003 01:36:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14877 invoked by uid 71); 3 Feb 2003 01:36:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 01:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030203013600.14876.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dirk Mueller Subject: Re: c++/9537: [3.4 regression] [New parser] problem handling const return types Reply-To: Dirk Mueller X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/9537; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dirk Mueller To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/9537: [3.4 regression] [New parser] problem handling const return types Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 02:33:59 +0100 bangerth@dealii.org schrieb am Sonntag, den 02. Februar 2003: > Confirmed. I would say the code is legal, and even if not > then it is certainly true that the error message absolutely > does not make sense at all. It seems PR 9440 describes a similiar problem. I've noticed this only after submitting my report. sorry. -- Dirk (received 805 mails today)