public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: libstdc++/9439: filebuf::sputbackc ignores beginning-of-file Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 14:26:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030203142600.3681.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/9439; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E9tur_Run=F3lfsson?= <peturr02@ru.is> Cc: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9439: filebuf::sputbackc ignores beginning-of-file Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:21:09 +0100 P=E9tur Run=F3lfsson wrote: >Hi, > =20 > >> Hi. I don't think there is a bug here: I cannot find in the >> standard a specific prescription for the behaviour you >> expect (in particular in 27.5.2.4.4) Can you? >> =20 >> > >Yes. 27.8.1.4 [lib.filebuf.virtuals] p5 describes how pbackfail may >put back the character c. The only cases that can apply here are the >ones starting with > [snip] Ok. I agree with your reading. Therefore it seems that seekoff should be changed to return error in=20 this case. Then pbackfail would pay attention to the negative returned=20 value. The latter changes will also fix libstdc++/9425. >> Indeed, sputbackc calls, as expected, pbackfail, which in=20 >>turns calls seekoff (fstream.tcc, line 218) (pay attention >> to the preceding comment which means that this specific=20 >>situation was considered and _not_ supposed to lead to an >> obvious failure). >> =20 >> >I read "at the beginning of the buffer" as simply meaning that >gptr() =3D=3D eback(), not as "at the beginning of the file". > Yes, you are right. Paolo. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-trail&database=3D= gcc&pr=3D9439
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-03 14:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-02-03 14:26 Paolo Carlini [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-02-05 19:23 paolo 2003-02-03 14:06 Pétur Runólfsson 2003-02-02 17:38 paolo 2003-01-25 12:06 peturr02
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030203142600.3681.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=pcarlini@unitus.it \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=paolo@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).