From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-28898-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19117 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2003 19:36:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19103 invoked by uid 71); 3 Feb 2003 19:36:00 -0000
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 19:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030203193600.19102.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Subject: Re: c++/9549: [3.4 regression] [New parser] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template
Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9549; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/9549: [3.4 regression] [New parser] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template
Date: 03 Feb 2003 20:34:05 +0100

 Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu> writes:
 
 |  > >     This is not a bug. You need to write
 |  > >       m.template do_it<T>();
 |  > 
 |  > This is incorrect, as is your previous analysis in PR #9510:
 
 I agree with Martin.
 
 |  > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9510
 |  > 
 |  > This syntax is required only if the right hand side of the
 |  > dot operator depends on a template parameter, otherwise it
 |  > is optional. Please read 14.2, p4 for more.
 |  
 |  Ehm, but in m.do_it<T>, the rhs of the dot operator _is_ template 
 |  dependent, no?
 
 Sure.  But that is irrelevant here. Because the lhs is -not- dependent.
 
 -- Gaby