public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c++/9549: [3.4 regression] [New parser] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 20:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030203200601.32407.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c++/9549; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/9549: [3.4 regression] [New parser] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:02:08 -0600 (CST)

 > I believe so. Here's what's in the final text:
 
 OK, that explains the confusion. Thanks for pointing this out. (It also 
 makes a lot more sense that the lhs must be template-dependent.)
 
 I'll also review the other report you pointed me to.
 
 
 So as a summary -- there are two bugs:
 - the code of this report shows an ICE, which is a regression
 - even without the ICE, the code is well-formed, but rejected by
   all versions of gcc since at least 2.95.
 
 Thanks for your assistance
   W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-03 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-03 20:06 Wolfgang Bangerth [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-01 19:00 giovannibajo
2003-02-03 20:06 Martin Sebor
2003-02-03 19:56 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-02-03 19:46 Martin Sebor
2003-02-03 19:46 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-02-03 19:36 Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-02-03 19:26 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-02-03 19:16 Martin Sebor
2003-02-03 19:00 bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030203200601.32407.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).