From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1728 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 20:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1702 invoked by uid 48); 4 Feb 2003 20:57:35 -0000 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 20:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030204205735.1701.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, grigory@stl.sarov.ru, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@gcc.gnu.org From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, grigory@stl.sarov.ru, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8612: Vtable layout: missing vcall offset X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Vtable layout: missing vcall offset Responsible-Changed-From-To: mmitchel->nathan Responsible-Changed-By: nathan Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 4 20:57:35 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: investigated State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: nathan State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 4 20:57:35 2003 State-Changed-Why: the new behaviour is correct. The vcall offset for that virtual base is zero. However, there is no interoperatability problem, because no vcall adjusting thunk is needed in the cited instance. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8612