From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29097-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18030 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 23:26:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18003 invoked by uid 48); 6 Feb 2003 23:26:20 -0000
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 23:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030206232620.18002.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: bmiller@txcorp.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Reply-To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, bmiller@txcorp.com,
  gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/9589: Segmentation fault on missing semicolon after class definition.
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Segmentation fault on missing semicolon after class definition.

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: reichelt
State-Changed-When: Thu Feb  6 23:26:19 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed, but fixed on 3.3 branch and mainline.
    
    A reduced testcase is the following:
    
    ---------------------snip here----------------------
    struct A
    {
        A();
        void foo() const;
    };
    
    struct B
    {
        void bar (const A &a) const { a.foo(); }
    } // missing semicolon
    
    A::A () {}
    ---------------------snip here----------------------
    
    It crashes gcc 2.95.x, 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.x.
    However, the code gives a regular error with 3.3 branch and mainline.
    Since it's not a regression I close the PR.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9589