From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29106-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13359 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2003 02:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13338 invoked by uid 71); 7 Feb 2003 02:26:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 02:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030207022601.13337.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Greg Schafer <gschafer@zip.com.au>
Subject: Re: other/9479: ld --version parsing in gcc configury fails on latest FSF binutils-2.13.2.1
Reply-To: Greg Schafer <gschafer@zip.com.au>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/9479; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Greg Schafer <gschafer@zip.com.au>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: other/9479: ld --version parsing in gcc configury fails on latest FSF binutils-2.13.2.1
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:24:38 +1100

 On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:14:55PM +1100, Greg Schafer wrote:
 > As of this writing, the current FSF binutils release is still 2.23.2.1 so
 > people using that version with gcc-3.3 & 3.4 are building subtley broken
 > gcc's.
 
 Of course, I meant, "is still 2.13.2.1".
 
 Greg