From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29107-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22434 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2003 02:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22419 invoked by uid 71); 7 Feb 2003 02:56:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 02:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030207025600.22418.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/7076: iostreams very slow compared with earlier gcc
 versions
Reply-To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/7076; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, morten@wtf.dk
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/7076: iostreams very slow compared with earlier gcc
 versions
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 18:48:06 -0800

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7076
 
 It seems that snprintf is being called now, while it wasn't in libstdc++ 
 version 2,
 making things about 8x to more than 20x slower depending on details.