From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23755 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2003 00:28:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23734 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2003 00:28:06 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030208002806.23733.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jamagallon@able.es, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jamagallon@able.es, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9622: [3.2 regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ incorrect in template dtors X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: __PRETTY_FUNCION__ incorrect in template dtors New Synopsis: [3.2 regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ incorrect in template dtors State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sat Feb 8 00:28:06 2003 State-Changed-Why: Fixed in 3.3 and 3.4, not fixed in 3.2.2. Worked in 2.95: tmp/g> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.3-pre/bin/c++ z.cc tmp/g> ./a.out A::A() B::B() [with T = int] B::~B() [with T = int] A::~A() tmp/g> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.2.2-pre/bin/c++ z.cc tmp/g> ./a.out A::A() B::B() [with T = int] void B::B() [with T = int] A::~A() tmp/g> c++ z.cc tmp/g> ./a.out A::A() B::B() B::~B() A::~A() I think I recall that there was once a report in the bug database about this case. It may contain a clue as to what patch fixed this. If you want, it would be great if you could try to find this patch, and it might go into a possible gcc3.2.3, if such a release ever happens. Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9622