From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27128 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2003 13:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27107 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2003 13:36:02 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 13:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030208133602.27106.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9626: g++ accepts vector > v(2, 4); X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: g++ accepts vector > v(2, 4); State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Sat Feb 8 13:36:01 2003 State-Changed-Why: On second thought, doesn't seem to me that your testcase is illegal. You are asking for a size 2 vector of size 4 vectors: there are no implicit conversions which should be prevented by explicit, since 4 is the argument of the explicit vector(const A& = A()) constructor of each of them and this seems perfectly legal. Agreed? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9626