From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1857 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2003 12:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1844 invoked by uid 71); 9 Feb 2003 12:06:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 12:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030209120601.1842.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: aj@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Paolo Carlini Subject: Re: libstdc++/8610: std::streamoff type is 32-bit in GCC 3.2 whereas it was 64-bit in GCC 2.96 Reply-To: Paolo Carlini X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00430.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/8610; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paolo Carlini To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, davido@csse.uwa.edu.au, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/8610: std::streamoff type is 32-bit in GCC 3.2 whereas it was 64-bit in GCC 2.96 Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 12:55:53 +0100 Andreas Jaeger wrote: [detailed explanations] >>Thanks for your past and future help, >> >;-) > Many, many thanks again! >Btw. What shall we do with this PR? > I think we should keep it in the analyzed state until it's fixed, i.e., LFS enabled in the library. After your clear explanations shouldn't be that difficult! As for the formal responsible, if you really prefer, I can assign it to myself. You choose. Paolo.