From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29265-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3542 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2003 20:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3510 invoked by uid 71); 11 Feb 2003 20:16:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030211201601.3509.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: c/8387: [3.3 regression] -finline-limit behavior changed; new
	inlining flags need doc
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/8387; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: garloff@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
	pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at, dalej@apple.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/8387: [3.3 regression] -finline-limit behavior changed; new
	inlining flags need doc
Date: 11 Feb 2003 21:14:18 +0100

 This also happens on -O1 -fpic on i586-pc-linux-gnu.  It disappears when
 I comment out "flag_crossjumping = 1;" in toplev.c, so this bug probably
 is somewhere in cleanup_cfg()
 
 Greetz
 Steven