public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: optimization/9052: in C code, "if" statement fails to execute  if optimized
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 17:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030212170600.28045.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR optimization/9052; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, phama@webjockey.net
Subject: Re: optimization/9052: in C code, "if" statement fails to execute 
	if optimized
Date: 12 Feb 2003 18:01:20 +0100

 Op wo 12-02-2003, om 17:55 schreef Eric Botcazou:
 > > Adding -ffloat-store will probably also make the "misbehaviour" go away.
 > 
 > It does.
 > 
 > > GCC is almost certainly using the register result from the current
 > > iteration to compare with the memory result from an earlier iteration.
 > > Since the register result has excess precision the compare for equality
 > > fails.  That's not a bug, it's just the FP works on the X86.
 > >
 > > So in summary, almost certainly "not a bug".
 > 
 > I fully concur. I think the PR can be closed.
 > 
 
 Nice, one more PR gone (still too many to go :-/).
 
 How about 8445, 9654?  Those are "bugs" that disappear with
 -ffloat-store, too.  Like I said, I don't know enough about floating
 point numbers...
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 
 
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-12 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-12 17:06 Steven Bosscher [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-18 10:41 ebotcazou
2003-02-14 21:16 Toon Moene
2003-02-13 21:56 Eric Botcazou
2003-02-13 19:46 Toon Moene
2003-02-13 11:56 Eric Botcazou
2003-02-12 16:56 Eric Botcazou
2003-02-12 16:46 Richard Earnshaw
2003-02-12 16:36 Steven Bosscher
2003-02-12 16:26 Richard Earnshaw
2003-02-12 15:26 Steven Bosscher
2002-12-24  5:36 phma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030212170600.28045.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).