From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2865 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2003 18:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2845 invoked by uid 48); 12 Feb 2003 18:54:38 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030212185438.2844.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, josh@joshisanerd.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rjvbertin@hotmail.com From: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, josh@joshisanerd.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rjvbertin@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9675: store-and-increment becomes increment-and-store X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00533.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: store-and-increment becomes increment-and-store State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rearnsha State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 12 18:54:38 2003 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug. You use and increment a variable twice in the same expression. This is undefined behaviour. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9675