From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29309-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17644 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2003 00:09:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17594 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2003 00:09:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030213000901.17592.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: china@thewrittenword.com, danglin@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: danglin@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: danglin@gcc.gnu.org, china@thewrittenword.com, danglin@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/9275: Should _SB_CTYPE_MACROS be defined on HP-UX 10.20?
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00546.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Should _SB_CTYPE_MACROS be defined on HP-UX 10.20?

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->danglin
Responsible-Changed-By: danglin
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 13 00:09:01 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Fixed.
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: danglin
State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 13 00:09:01 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Fixed 3.2, 3.3 and trunk.
    <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00779.html>

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9275