From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17113 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2003 21:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17099 invoked by uid 71); 13 Feb 2003 21:56:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030213215600.17098.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Eric Botcazou Subject: Re: optimization/9052: in C code, "if" statement fails to execute if optimized Reply-To: Eric Botcazou X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00598.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/9052; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eric Botcazou To: Toon Moene Cc: Steven Bosscher , Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, phama@webjockey.net Subject: Re: optimization/9052: in C code, "if" statement fails to execute if optimized Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:41:43 +0100 > Exactly - however, I feel I cannot close these reports because I do not > have access to x86 hardware anymore, so I cannot easily test whether > they indeed *are* -ffloat-store issues .... Steven probably checked it too, but I can confirm that PR fortran/8445 vanishes (i.e the ouput is back to 1 line) when compiled with -O1 -ffloat-store instead of -O1 only. Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/3.2.3/specs Configured with: ../configure --host=i586-redhat-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr/local --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f77 --enable-checking=misc,tree --disable-nls Thread model: posix gcc version 3.2.3 20030210 (prerelease) -- Eric Botcazou