From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3286 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2003 22:30:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3262 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2003 22:30:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030213223038.3261.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, lxg8906@yahoo.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, lxg8906@yahoo.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9693: sequence point consistency X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00599.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: sequence point consistency State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nathan State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 13 22:30:38 2003 State-Changed-Why: not a bug. the first program invokes undefined behaviour, the second does not. The C++ standard defines where sequence points are. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9693