From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29364-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7010 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2003 23:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6995 invoked by uid 71); 13 Feb 2003 23:26:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030213232600.6994.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/8154: gcj not emitting switch table
Reply-To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00601.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8154; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Cc: GNATS Filer <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/8154: gcj not emitting switch table
Date: 13 Feb 2003 16:06:41 -0700

 >>>>> "Steven" == Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> writes:
 
 Steven> This looks like another duplicate of c/7887, but since this
 Steven> one appears to be triggered without -fpic, it could also be
 Steven> linked somehow to 8502.  I never compile/use java, but maybe a
 Steven> java hacker can use this information?
 
 I tried the c/7887 fix with the test case in 8154.
 It still fails.  So apparently we have a different bug here :-(
 
 Tom