From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26934 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2003 20:53:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26914 invoked by uid 48); 14 Feb 2003 20:53:47 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030214205347.26913.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, stefan@space.twc.de From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, stefan@space.twc.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9630: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] crash with -freg-struct-return in C++ code X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00620.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: crash with -freg-struct-return in C++ code New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] crash with -freg-struct-return in C++ code State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 14 20:53:46 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. Worked with 2.95, so is a regression. Stefan, if you want to help us greatly, try to reduce the code further, by first using -save-temps to get rid of what the preprocessor does, then delete all the lines starting with a '#', and then chip away whatever is not needed to demonstrate the bug. We need to find out which function exactly is being miscompiled, and the present testcase is too large for this, so it would take us some time. If you could try to get it smaller, that would be greatly appreciated! Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9630