From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29391-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18106 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2003 21:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18074 invoked by uid 71); 14 Feb 2003 21:16:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030214211601.18073.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/9665
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9665; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/9665
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:11:42 -0600 (CST)

 Ah, found the duplicate: it's 9545, which I just closed since this one has 
 more information.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/