From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26457 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2003 21:24:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26430 invoked by uid 48); 14 Feb 2003 21:24:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030214212446.26428.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: benger@zib.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, benger@zib.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9674: initialization of static class template members just by instantiation does not work X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00630.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: initialization of static class template members just by instantiation does not work State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 14 21:24:46 2003 State-Changed-Why: Behavior confirmed. Don't know, though, what the standard says exactly about this. Language lawyers? W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9674