From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29710 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2003 21:29:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29687 invoked by uid 48); 14 Feb 2003 21:29:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030214212945.29686.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dohashi@floccinaucinihilipilification.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, dohashi@floccinaucinihilipilification.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9683: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] bug in initialization chains for static const variables from template classes X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00632.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: bug in initialization chains for static const variables from template classes New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] bug in initialization chains for static const variables from template classes State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 14 21:29:45 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. A regression in 3.2/3.3/3.4 against 2.95. It also fails in 3.0.4, by the way. May or may not be related to 9674. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9683