public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bangerth@dealii.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com,
	matz@suse.de, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/9704: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of classes with bit fields
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030214221406.24731.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

Old Synopsis: miscompiles openoffice (deals with bitfield members)
New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of classes with bit fields

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel
Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 14 22:14:05 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Possibly the one who's guilty ;-)
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 14 22:14:05 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. Cleaned-up code:
    --------------------------
    extern "C" void abort(void);
    
    struct Dummy {
        void *p;
        Dummy()             {}
        Dummy(const Dummy&) {}
    };
    
    struct X {
        int  :1;
        int n:1;
        X () : n(1) {}
    };
    
    
    struct Y {
        Dummy dummy;
        X x;
    };
    
    int main()
    {
      Y y1;
      Y y2(y1);
      if (y1.x.n != y2.x.n)
        abort ();
    }
    ------------------------------
    This aborts with 3.3 and 3.4, though it shouldn't, of
    course (original and copy should be equal).
    
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9704


             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-14 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-14 22:14 bangerth [this message]
2003-02-18 19:19 mmitchel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030214221406.24731.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=bangerth@dealii.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).