From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14766 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2003 02:10:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14743 invoked by uid 48); 15 Feb 2003 02:10:12 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 02:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030215021012.14742.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: agriffis@gentoo.org, bjb@gentoo.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, msterret@coat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, wwoods@gentoo.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, agriffis@gentoo.org, bjb@gentoo.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, msterret@coat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, wwoods@gentoo.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/9700: va_start gets __offset wrong in some situations X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00655.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: va_start gets __offset wrong in some situations State-Changed-From-To: closed->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sat Feb 15 02:10:12 2003 State-Changed-Why: Admittedly I only looked at the program given in the first report. So, let me ask again: I think that that program does exactly what should be expected, is this right? If so, the comment in that program about expectations is wrong. Second question: if the program in the first report doesn't show the problem at all, is it demonstrated in the second? If so, I'll be happy to take a look at that one on Monday. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9700