From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14261 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2003 14:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14242 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2003 14:57:51 -0000 Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030216145751.14241.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, larry@tmpinc.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, larry@tmpinc.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9632: 'If' statement evaluates differently depending on optimization (-O vs -g) X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00687.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: 'If' statement evaluates differently depending on optimization (-O vs -g) State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: ebotcazou State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 16 14:57:51 2003 State-Changed-Why: GCC 2.96 is not an official FSF release. Report the bug directly to RedHat. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9632