From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29452-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19462 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2003 15:30:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19442 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2003 15:30:11 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:30:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030216153011.19441.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  richard@wetafx.co.nz
From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org, richard@wetafx.co.nz, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/9654: extra-precision fp comparisons are less accurate
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00689.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: extra-precision fp comparisons are less accurate

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: ebotcazou
State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 16 15:30:11 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Not a bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9654