From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16168 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 22:17:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16147 invoked by uid 48); 17 Feb 2003 22:17:07 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030217221707.16146.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ortiza@ca.ibm.com, thomasl@ca.ibm.com From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ortiza@ca.ibm.com, thomasl@ca.ibm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9733: Incorrect defintion for allocator::allocate(size_t,void*) X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00741.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Incorrect defintion for allocator::allocate(size_t,void*) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 17 22:17:07 2003 State-Changed-Why: Hummm. One thing are the standars set of requirements for allocators, another the detailed features of the default allocator which you are deriving from: looking at 20.4.1.1 it seems that our implementation has the correct signature. Do you agree? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9733