From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29537-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11202 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2003 08:04:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11182 invoked by uid 48); 18 Feb 2003 08:04:35 -0000
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030218080435.11181.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  richard@wetafx.co.nz
From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org, richard@wetafx.co.nz, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/9736: same fp comparison can lead to different results
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00774.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: same fp comparison can lead to different results

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: ebotcazou
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 08:04:35 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    What do you want GCC to do exactly in this case? It already provides an option to fix the problem.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9736