From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2547 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2003 13:59:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2528 invoked by uid 48); 18 Feb 2003 13:59:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030218135924.2527.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/8697: [IA-64] combine bug X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00814.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: [IA64] Lost zero-extension New Synopsis: [IA-64] combine bug State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: ebotcazou State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 13:59:24 2003 State-Changed-Why: Very likely a duplicate of PR opt/9279, which is fixed on 3.3 branch and mainline but is in "won't fix" state on the 3.2 branch. Could you verify that the problem is gone on one of the two aforementioned codebases? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8697