From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29613-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17738 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2003 20:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17720 invoked by uid 71); 18 Feb 2003 20:06:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030218200600.17719.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Subject: Re: optimization/8697: [IA-64] combine bug
Reply-To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00850.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8697; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/8697: [IA-64] combine bug
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:00:37 +0100

 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> writes:
 
 |> > Still reproducable with both 3.3 and 3.4 as of today.
 |> 
 |> Are you sure?
 
 The test case is buggy. :-(  The first line of main should actually read
 
   operands[1] = gen_rtx_CONST_INT (0, 0x400000);
 
 With this correction it works now.
 
 Andreas.
 
 -- 
 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
 SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
 Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
 "And now for something completely different."