From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10787 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 02:50:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10763 invoked by uid 48); 19 Feb 2003 02:50:19 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 02:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030219025019.10762.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, john.carter@tait.co.nz, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, john.carter@tait.co.nz, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9750: Strange code in handling of COND? expressions in cp/call.c X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00864.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Strange code in handling of COND? expressions in cp/call.c Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 19 02:50:19 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Inserted the comment before the dubious part of the code as well as most of the other stuff around. State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 19 02:50:19 2003 State-Changed-Why: True -- good spot! The code is still in present CVS. CVS annotate shows for this part: 1.1 (law 11-Aug-97): return candidates; 1.152 (mmitchel 26-Jul-99): 1.152 (mmitchel 26-Jul-99): /* We don't check that the two types are the same; the logic 1.152 (mmitchel 26-Jul-99): below will actually create two candidates; one in which both 1.152 (mmitchel 26-Jul-99): parameter types are TYPE1, and one in which both parameter 1.152 (mmitchel 26-Jul-99): types are TYPE2. */ 1.1 (law 11-Aug-97): break; 1.152 (mmitchel 26-Jul-99): 1.329 (mrs 09-Aug-02): /* These arguments do not make for a valid overloaded operator. */ 1.1 (law 11-Aug-97): return candidates; So I guess Mark might know best what should come after the comment he inserted. Probably something easy enough to check. If you have more of this dubious stuff, let us know! Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9750