From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28693 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 11:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28600 invoked by uid 71); 19 Feb 2003 11:56:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030219115601.28599.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Sergei Pachkov Subject: Re: inline-asm/7735: omit asm code Reply-To: Sergei Pachkov X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00903.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR inline-asm/7735; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergei Pachkov To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, spigel@olvs.miee.ru, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: inline-asm/7735: omit asm code Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:52:07 +0300 Sorry, I know it is not a bug. Its my mistake. I tried to reorganize my c&asm code and compiler produced a object file nicely. ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org wrote: >Synopsis: omit asm code > >State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >State-Changed-By: ebotcazou >State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 19 07:29:55 2003 >State-Changed-Why: > Not a bug. Your extended asm statements have no side-effects, > mark them as "volatile" to prevent the optimizer from removing them. > >http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7735 > > >