public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@sbcglobal.net>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: optimization/9736: same fp comparison can lead to different results
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030219140601.17413.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR optimization/9736; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@sbcglobal.net>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>,
   Richard Addison-Wood <richard@wetafx.co.nz>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/9736: same fp comparison can lead to different results
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:56:06 -0800

 On Wednesday 19 February 2003 01:02, Eric Botcazou wrote:
 > > If the compiler produces valid assembly code that does not
 > > correctly execute the input source code, that is a compiler bug.
 >
 > Sure. But why do you keep using a compilation mode that you know will
 > generate a faulty executable for your program? I can't say much more than
 > the GCC manual here: if your program relies on exact IEEE floating-point
 > semantics to properly work, compile it with -ffloat-store. Otherwise
 > eliminate the dependencies on the IEEE format.
 You might consider the options -march=pentium[34] -mfpmath=sse, or changing 
 the precision mode you run in, since you seem to want an alternative to 
 -ffloat-store to achieve those effects.
 -- 
 Tim Prince


             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19 14:06 Tim Prince [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-05  7:46 ebotcazou
2003-03-05  3:26 Richard Addison-Wood
2003-02-27  7:46 Richard Addison-Wood
2003-02-19  9:06 Eric Botcazou
2003-02-18 22:16 Richard Addison-Wood
2003-02-18  8:04 ebotcazou
2003-02-17 23:16 richard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030219140601.17413.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=timothyprince@sbcglobal.net \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).