From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 975 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 955 invoked by uid 71); 19 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030219152600.954.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: c++/3187: gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors Reply-To: Nathan Sidwell X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00924.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/3187; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathan Sidwell To: Steven Bosscher Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, peter@empeg.com, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/3187: gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:16:14 +0000 Steven Bosscher wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3187 > > > This PR is _really_ old. Last modified over a year and a half ago, so it > should go in feedback. It would be even better if this bug is fixed > because it's a pretty serious bug IMO. no. analyzed is the right state. Why do you think it serious? It does not cause miscompilation or reject legal code. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC The voices in my head said this was stupid too nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org