From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29688-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1017 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 978 invoked by uid 71); 19 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030219152600.977.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: c++/3187: gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of
	constructors
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00925.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/3187; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	peter@empeg.com, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/3187: gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of
	constructors
Date: 19 Feb 2003 16:21:59 +0100

 Op wo 19-02-2003, om 16:16 schreef Nathan Sidwell:
 > Steven Bosscher wrote:
 > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3187 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > This PR is _really_ old. Last modified over a year and a half ago, so it 
 > > should go in feedback.  It would be even better if this bug is fixed 
 > > because it's a pretty serious bug IMO.
 > no. analyzed is the right state. Why do you think it serious? It does
 > not cause miscompilation or reject legal code.
 
 Nope, that's why I didn't say critical.  I think it's serious because of
 the 20% increase in code size as claimed in the PR.