From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25581 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 16:36:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25566 invoked by uid 71); 19 Feb 2003 16:36:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030219163600.25565.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: sje@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Steve Ellcey Subject: Re: optimization/6856: -O2 options causes Internal compiler error on hpux11.00 Reply-To: Steve Ellcey X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00935.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6856; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Steve Ellcey To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, corrado.giacomini@trema.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, harri.pasanen@trema.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sje@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/6856: -O2 options causes Internal compiler error on hpux11.00 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:27:44 -0800 (PST) No it wasn't. No one ever approved it (nor was it explicitly disapproved), there were no comments on it at all. Steve Ellcey sje@cup.hp.com > Synopsis: -O2 options causes Internal compiler error on hpux11.00 > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->sje > Responsible-Changed-By: ebotcazou > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 19 10:13:41 2003 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Submitter of the patch. > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: ebotcazou > State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 19 10:13:41 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Steve, was your patch checked in? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6856