From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7631 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 16:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7549 invoked by uid 71); 19 Feb 2003 16:56:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030219165600.7548.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mirsad Todorovac Subject: Re: c/2776: Wrong (misleading) error message in gcc 2.95.3 Reply-To: Mirsad Todorovac X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00938.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/2776; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mirsad Todorovac To: bangerth@dealii.org, , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c/2776: Wrong (misleading) error message in gcc 2.95.3 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:45:08 +0100 (CET) On 19 Feb 2003 bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Synopsis: Wrong (misleading) error message in gcc 2.95.3 > > State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 19 14:27:03 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > I guess, Steven is right. There's no value in keeping this > one open. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2776 I apologize if I was wasting your precious timewith this as it now seems not so important issue, but I wasted so much time resolving it that I thought it was important to be resolved, or at least known issue. Thank you for your time. Mirsad