From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29718-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9556 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 21:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9535 invoked by uid 71); 19 Feb 2003 21:16:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030219211600.9533.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
Subject: Re: middle-end/9725: Invalid dependency determination
Reply-To: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00955.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR middle-end/9725; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: middle-end/9725: Invalid dependency determination
Date: 19 Feb 2003 23:10:36 +0200

 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:
 
     Jan> But why is the structure incompatible?
     Jan> "... an aggregate or union type that includes one of the aforementioned
     Jan> types among its
     Jan> members (including, recursively, a member of a subaggregate or
     Jan> contained union), ..."
 
 which means that you example should be coded as
 
 struct s
 {
   unsigned f1:16;
   unsigned f2:16;
 };
 
 void
 test (unsigned *pf, unsigned x, unsigned y)
 {
   union
   {
     unsigned f;
     struct s s;
   } u;
 
   u.s.f1 = x;
   u.s.f2 = y;
   
   *pf = u.f;
 }
 
 
 ~velco