From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29744-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22757 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2003 09:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22718 invoked by uid 71); 20 Feb 2003 09:06:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030220090601.22717.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
Subject: Re: middle-end/9725: Invalid dependency determination
Reply-To: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00981.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR middle-end/9725; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: middle-end/9725: Invalid dependency determination
Date: 20 Feb 2003 10:57:02 +0200

 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:
 
     Jan> Which doesn't work (and possibly doesn't have to as outlined in the
     Jan> other mail, depending on how you interpret the wording of the standard)
     Jan> when used as
 
     Jan>   (&u.s)->f1 = x;
     Jan>   (&u.s)->f2 = y;
 
 Then it's a bug. Try the same with shorts instead of bitfields.
 
 ~velco