From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32636 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2003 19:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32622 invoked by uid 71); 21 Feb 2003 19:26:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030221192600.32621.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/9524 Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01077.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/9524; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: matz@suse.de, Cc: Subject: Re: c++/9524 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:07:13 -0600 (CST) Michael, apparently it was forgotten to update synopsis and priority of this report to reflect a regression. I just did this. It seems as if this has been fixed on mainline, but it still aborts for me on a 3.3 snapshot of 2003-02-14. Can you double check whether it may already have been fixed on 3.3 as well and if not possibly identify the patch that fixed it on mainline, for backporting? W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/