From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29841-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28592 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2003 20:06:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28578 invoked by uid 71); 21 Feb 2003 20:06:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030221200600.28577.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/9524
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01078.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9524; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/9524
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:03:52 -0600 (CST)

 > > It seems as if this has been fixed on mainline,
 > 
 > No:
 > [...]
 
 Uhm, but it does compile for me with mainline, while I see the failure 
 with 3.3. Will put it on my list to check after the next update.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/