From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-29882-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21980 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2003 14:16:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21957 invoked by uid 71); 22 Feb 2003 14:15:59 -0000
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030222141559.21956.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: c/8602: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning
 messages when using inline functions
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01119.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/8602; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	asuffield@debian.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, 153965@bugs.debian.org,
	rth@gcc.gnu.org, doko@cs.tu-berlin.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/8602: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning
 messages when using inline functions
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:10:41 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8602
 
 Could this patch by any change have fixed the actual issue?
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01957.html