From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7436 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 22:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7418 invoked by uid 71); 24 Feb 2003 22:46:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030224224601.7417.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Janis Johnson Subject: Re: c++/9820: [3.3/3.4 regression] ice in build_baselink (templates) Reply-To: Janis Johnson X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01300.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/9820; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Janis Johnson To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, poschmid@lbl.gov Cc: Subject: Re: c++/9820: [3.3/3.4 regression] ice in build_baselink (templates) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:47:31 -0800 The submitter says this test case should be valid, but GCC 3.0.4 and the 3.2-branch both report errors. I was planning to hunt for the patch that caused the regression, but if there's a test case that ICEs on legal code, I'd prefer to use that one. Output from GCC 3.2.2 20021220 (prerelease) with -w: 9820.C: In instantiation of `IsFunctionT': 9820.C:23: instantiated from `IsClassT' 9820.C:23: instantiated from `void check() [with T = int]' 9820.C:29: instantiated from here 9820.C:23: no method `IsFunctionT::test' 9820.C:23: enumerator value for `Yes' not integer constant http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9820