From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16672 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2003 22:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16653 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2003 22:37:40 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030225223740.16652.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rassahah@neofonie.de From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rassahah@neofonie.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in expand_expr X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01337.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: g++-3.4 ice on :?-operator with double class definition in expand_expr New Synopsis: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in expand_expr State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 25 22:37:40 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. A regression in mainline from 3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9847