From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10725 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 18:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10709 invoked by uid 71); 26 Feb 2003 18:06:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030226180601.10708.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Acereda_Maci=E1?= Subject: Re: optimization/8092: cross-jump triggers too often Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Acereda_Maci=E1?= X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01390.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8092; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Acereda_Maci=E1?= To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, bernd.paysan@gmx.de, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/8092: cross-jump triggers too often Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:04:44 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=8092 I have also faced this problem in ARM devices when compiling our own threaded interpreter. I for one would love to see this patch or an equivalent applied.