From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18658 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 19:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18623 invoked by uid 48); 26 Feb 2003 19:26:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030226192600.18622.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mas@systems.caltech.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mas@systems.caltech.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01393.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: gcc 3.2 miscompiles non constant structure initializer New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 26 19:26:00 2003 State-Changed-Why: Behavior confirmed. If the code is legal, then this is a regression from 3.0.4, which yielded the expected result. 3.2, 3.3 and mainline all print something unexpected. Someone with standard knowledge should verify what is expected behavior here. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9853