public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030226213601.3215.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR optimization/9859; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com> To: <bangerth@dealii.org>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>, <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>, <suzhe@turbolinux.com.cn>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org> Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:22:23 +1100 I'm wondering if 9805 and this both have a common cause. Gareth ----- Original Message ----- From: <bangerth@dealii.org> To: <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>; <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>; <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>; <suzhe@turbolinux.com.cn> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:51 AM Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file > Old Synopsis: gcc 3.2.2 cannot compile gtk-gnutella 0.91.9 with -O2 option (was bug 9855) > New Synopsis: excessive memory consumption on GTK file > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 26 19:51:54 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Confirmed. At one point, memory consumption blows up to > beyond 300 MB, at which point my small machine gives up. > Without optimization, memory use stays below 20 MB, so I'd > say this is a bug. > > 3.0, 3.2.x, 3.3 and 3.4 all show this behavior. I don't know > whether 2.95 does this, too, since it doesn't grok the > preprocessed sources. > > The code is really ugly, one would wish that the GTK people > had chosen a decent programming language for their project... :-( > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=9859 >
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-26 21:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-02-26 21:36 Gareth Pearce [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-02-27 16:36 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-02-26 19:51 bangerth
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030226213601.3215.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=tilps@hotmail.com \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).