From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3230 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 21:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3216 invoked by uid 71); 26 Feb 2003 21:36:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030226213601.3215.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Gareth Pearce" Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file Reply-To: "Gareth Pearce" X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01398.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/9859; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Gareth Pearce" To: , , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:22:23 +1100 I'm wondering if 9805 and this both have a common cause. Gareth ----- Original Message ----- From: To: ; ; ; Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:51 AM Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file > Old Synopsis: gcc 3.2.2 cannot compile gtk-gnutella 0.91.9 with -O2 option (was bug 9855) > New Synopsis: excessive memory consumption on GTK file > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 26 19:51:54 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Confirmed. At one point, memory consumption blows up to > beyond 300 MB, at which point my small machine gives up. > Without optimization, memory use stays below 20 MB, so I'd > say this is a bug. > > 3.0, 3.2.x, 3.3 and 3.4 all show this behavior. I don't know > whether 2.95 does this, too, since it doesn't grok the > preprocessed sources. > > The code is really ugly, one would wish that the GTK people > had chosen a decent programming language for their project... :-( > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=9859 >