From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29840 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2003 14:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29806 invoked by uid 71); 27 Feb 2003 14:16:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030227141601.29805.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bje@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Ben Elliston Subject: Re: ada/9406: Documentation suggestion Reply-To: Ben Elliston X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01412.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/9406; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ben Elliston To: Geert Bosch Cc: Simon Wright , bosch@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: ada/9406: Documentation suggestion Date: 28 Feb 2003 01:07:22 +1100 >>>>> "Geert" == Geert Bosch writes: >> I see your point about partitions though I must say it was far from >> obvious that I should be looking there. Perhaps the UM should have a >> reference to the RM. Geert> I now see what you mean. I agree that the language here could Geert> be improved. Actually, the language from the Ada RM that I Geert> quoted seems to be pretty clear, so I think we should borrow Geert> from that or indeed put in a link (or both). I'm not an Ada language lawyer, so the scope of this PR is a bit beyond me now. I will commit the simple grammar fix and then put the PR back into analysed state so that it can be finished off by one of you fellows. Cheers, Ben